Actually, Lombardi had a higher winning percentage than Madden.
Actually, Lombardi had a higher winning percentage than Madden.
"Why so serious?"
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: MOX</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Actually, Lombardi had a higher winning percentage than Madden. </div></div>
If you include playoffs.
...And if you ain't down with that, I got 2 words for ya....
Don't you think you should include the playoffs? I find the playoffs to be very important.
"Why so serious?"
Considering playoff stats for players aren't included in overall stats..no.
...And if you ain't down with that, I got 2 words for ya....
If we don't include play-offs ,then my concept of the game needs an overhaul.
the man, the myth, the legend Don Shula
He was consistent: In 33 years as an NFL head coach -- first with the Colts in the 1960s and then for 26 years with the Dolphins -- only two times did Shula coach a team that finished below .500.
He could win the big games: Six of Shula's teams made it to the Super Bowl, and two came away victorious. 2-4 in the SB isn't that great of a record, but hey, atleast he made it there 6 times.
He endured: No other coach in NFL history has won more games; including the playoffs, Shula went 347-173-6, a .665 winning percentage.
He could be spectacularly great: In 1972 and 1973, the two Dolphins' Super Bowl-winning seasons (including the perfect season), Miami went a remarkable 32-2.
"Why so serious?"
Not when it comes to stats.
...And if you ain't down with that, I got 2 words for ya....
True, I'm just thinking about the won/loss.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks